After waiving his fair to a preliminary hearing earlier this week, Jerry Sandusky continued to maintain that he is not guilty of the more than 50 counts of sexual assault that he is facing, much invoking a football metaphor during a brief statement to the press.
“What we intend is to place together the best imaginable defense that we could do, to stay the direction, to fight for four quarters, and await the opportunity to present our side,” Sandusky said before leaving the courthouse in Bellefonte, Pa.
As part of this “best imaginable defense,” Sandusky’s lawyers are actively engaging the media. After the alleged sexual predator returned to his house, Sandusky’s lawyer, Joseph Amendola, held court with a large media contingent, seizing the opportunity to present his client’s condition in the court of public belief. By Amendola’s side on the steps of the courthouse was another member of Sandusky’s legal team, attorney Karl Rominger.
Based in Carlisle, Pa., Rominger has also been speaking up on behalf of his client this week. During an appearance with ABC27 News on Tuesday, Rominger suggested that Sandusky could have been showering with boys — something that he has repeatedly admitted to — in order to teach them “basic hygiene skills” rather than for any sexual purpose.
“Some of these kids don’t have basic hygiene skills,” Rominger told ABC 27. “Teaching a person to shower at the age of 12 or 14 sounds weird to some human beings, however human beings who employment with troubled youth will tell you there are a abundance of juvenile delinquents and human beings who are dependent who have to be taught basic lifetime skills like how to place soap on their body.”
When pressed about his showers with the young boys accusing him of sexual assault during an interview with NBC’s Bob Costas, Sandusky made no mention of any such instructional purpose, instead admitting to “horsing encircling” during showers with the alleged victims.
Although Rominger’s interview with ABC 27 suggests that he has the same views on media engagement as Amendola, there is a advertise on the Rominger & Associates website that suggests these two members of Team Sandusky may not always be on the same sheet. In September 2011, Rominger posted an article entitled “What Is A Preliminary Hearing?” and wrote that it is a common mistake to waive this hearing. Clearly, Amendola felt differently in this condition.
UPDATE 12/16 6:20 PM: On Thursday, Rominger issued a statement clarifying his comments earlier in the week about the reasons why an adult might shower with an adolescent.
“When answering why a person might be in a shower with a youth, I proposed one hypothetical, such as an adult leading by example and encouraging a youth with terrible or poor hygiene to shower regularly. Some commentators have argued that I am saying that Mr. Sandusky showered with youths and touched them inappropriately for the purpose of teaching them how to shower. That is not what I said. First, there’s no evidence of inappropriate touching in a shower, except for discredited statements from the grand jury presentment. Further, Jerry has maintained his innocent and denies any sexual touching or inappropriate touching in the shower. Therefore, I desire to clarify that I am not suggesting that this is what happened in this condition, however was answering questions about imaginable motivations an individual might have for an adult to shower with a juvenile.”
The slideshow below shows the key players in the Sandusky scandal:
DOWNLOAD: War In Iraq